- Home
- Search Results
- Page 1 of 1
Search for: All records
-
Total Resources2
- Resource Type
-
0000000002000000
- More
- Availability
-
20
- Author / Contributor
- Filter by Author / Creator
-
-
Lewis, A Kelsey (2)
-
Lipshutz, Sara E (2)
-
Anderson, Andrew P (1)
-
Burns, Mercedes (1)
-
Cooper, Idelle (1)
-
Hawkes, Kristen (1)
-
Hayssen, Virginia (1)
-
Holekamp, Kay E (1)
-
Hook, Kristin A (1)
-
James, Timothy Y (1)
-
Josefson, Chloe C (1)
-
Kimmitt, Abigail A (1)
-
Kralick, Alexandra E (1)
-
Lindahl, Hans (1)
-
Lynch, Kathleen S (1)
-
McLaughlin, J F (1)
-
Orr, Teri J (1)
-
Sharpe, Sam L (1)
-
Sirot, Laura K (1)
-
Stadtmauer, Daniel J (1)
-
- Filter by Editor
-
-
null (1)
-
& Spizer, S. M. (0)
-
& . Spizer, S. (0)
-
& Ahn, J. (0)
-
& Bateiha, S. (0)
-
& Bosch, N. (0)
-
& Brennan K. (0)
-
& Brennan, K. (0)
-
& Chen, B. (0)
-
& Chen, Bodong (0)
-
& Drown, S. (0)
-
& Ferretti, F. (0)
-
& Higgins, A. (0)
-
& J. Peters (0)
-
& Kali, Y. (0)
-
& Ruiz-Arias, P.M. (0)
-
& S. Spitzer (0)
-
& Sahin. I. (0)
-
& Spitzer, S. (0)
-
& Spitzer, S.M. (0)
-
-
Have feedback or suggestions for a way to improve these results?
!
Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Synopsis What are the implications of misunderstanding sex as a binary, and why is it essential for scientists to incorporate a more expansive view of biological sex in our teaching and research? This roundtable will include many of our symposium speakers, including biologists and intersex advocates, to discuss these topics and visibilize the link between ongoing reification of dyadic sex within scientific communities and the social, political, and medical oppression faced by queer, transgender, and especially intersex communities. As with the symposium as a whole, this conversation is designed to bring together empirical research and implementation of equity, inclusion, and justice principles, which are often siloed into separate rooms and conversations at academic conferences. Given the local and national attacks on the rights of intersex individuals and access to medical care and bodily autonomy, this interdisciplinary discussion is both timely and urgent.more » « less
-
Orr, Teri J; Burns, Mercedes; Hawkes, Kristen; Holekamp, Kay E; Hook, Kristin A; Josefson, Chloe C; Kimmitt, Abigail A; Lewis, A Kelsey; Lipshutz, Sara E; Lynch, Kathleen S; et al (, Integrative and Comparative Biology)null (Ed.)Synopsis Like many scientific disciplines, the field of reproductive biology is subject to biases in terminology and research foci. For example, females are often described as coy and passive players in reproductive behaviors and are termed “promiscuous” if they engage in extra-pair copulations. Males on the other hand are viewed as actively holding territories and fighting with other males. Males are termed “multiply mating” if they mate with multiple females. Similarly, textbooks often illustrate meiosis as it occurs in males but not females. This edition of Integrative and Comparative Biology (ICB) includes a series of papers that focus on reproduction from the female perspective. These papers represent a subset of the work presented in our symposium and complementary sessions on female reproductive biology. In this round table discussion, we use a question and answer format to leverage the diverse perspectives and voices involved with the symposium in an exploration of theoretical, cultural, pedagogical, and scientific issues related to the study of female biology. We hope this dialog will provide a stepping-stone toward moving reproductive science and teaching to a more inclusive and objective framework.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
